Joel Uckelman on Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:32:20 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Russian setup |
Thus spake "Nate Ellefson": > > > By the way, what optional rules are we playing with? > > > > We're not using 12.4, since it seems worse than repatriation. > > > > Also, we're using 10.3.4 (Forcible Access), which appeared in > > errata in The General: > > > http://eia.xnetz.com/rules/errata.html > > Generally, we're applying the errata, except 12.3.10 (Overwhelming > Numbers). I don't believe we've ever discussed 12.3.9 (No Ceding), and > it is my understanding that we're not using that one either. > > I think that covers all of the exceptions. > > ***** > > So just so there's no mistake, I can take this to mean that we're > playing with all of the optional rules except those that we're expressly > not playing with? Yeah, that's my understanding. -- J. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia