Re: [eia] Russian setup

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    FYI, I don't plan to post Turkey's initial setup until the weekend.  As
I am under attack, I need time to consider the placement of my forces
carefully.  If there are other players who are not concerned about Turkey's
placement of forces, they can feel free to go early.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Russian setup


> Thus spake "Kyle H":
> >
> > > > By the way, what optional rules are we playing with?
> > >
> > > We're not using 12.4, since it seems worse than repatriation.
> > >
> > > Also, we're using 10.3.4 (Forcible Access), which appeared in errata
in
> > The General:
> > >
> > > http://eia.xnetz.com/rules/errata.html
> > >
> > > Generally, we're applying the errata, except 12.3.10 (Overwhelming
> > Numbers). I don't believe we've ever discussed 12.3.9 (No Ceding), and
it is
> > my understanding that we're not using that one either.
> > >
> > > I think that covers all of the exceptions.
> > >
> >
> > Last game we also decided to scrap 12.8.
> >
> > kdh
>
> We did? I guess I didn't know that, but it also never came up. (I'm not
opposed to dropping 12.8.)
>
> -- 
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia