Re: [eia] Prussian land phase- Nov 07

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    When I looked at Jim's orders before, I was assuming that the Saxony
corps foraged at 5- because the orders were written out of order.  That is,
I was assuming that the infantry corps at Hanover moved out before the
Saxony corps moved in.  But in order to conquer Hanover this turn, Prussian
forces must maintain uninterrupted possession of Hanover.  In that case, the
Saxony corps had to arrive *before* the Prussian corps left.  But that means
that the Saxony corps is foraging at 3 (base value) + 2 (unused movement) -
1 (corps in area) = 4-.  Since Jim rolled a 6 on that forage, that should be
two losses to the Saxony corps, not one.
    Does that make sense to everyone, or am I wrong about this?

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "EiA" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: [eia] Prussian land phase- Nov 07


> No depots removed or placed.
>
> 1 I Kassel -->Lubeck  {$1}
> 1 I Hanover --> Hamburg  {$2}
> 1 I holds in Kassel  {f 8-}
> Saxons Brandenburg --> Hanover  {f 5-}
> 1 I (w/ Hohen.)  Minden --> Kassel  {f 6-}
> 1 I Hanover --> Kassel  {$2}
> 2 I (w/ Blucher) Leopoldstadt --> Munich  {Austrian supply}
> Polish Cav  Vienna --> Salzburg  {f 6-}
> Polish Inf. Leopoldstadt --> Salzburg  {Austrian supply}
> Total Cost= $5
>
>
> P.S.  Kyle, does the garrison at Hamburg destroy the depot and retreat to
> the city?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia