Re: [eia] Prussian land phase- Nov 07

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    Oops again.  I just realized that the forage orders will remain the same
for both of these corps: the Polish cav corps can still forage automatically
(assuming it arrives in Munich before the other corps) and the Polish inf
corps can still get supplied by Austria as stated in your original orders.

I'll just shut up now.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Prussian land phase- Nov 07


>     Oops, we must have been sending these emails at exactly the same time.
> Sorry for the duplication.  Will Austria be paying to supply both of these
> corps as well?
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 8:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] Prussian land phase- Nov 07
>
>
> >     Jim, don't forget that you also need to fix your orders with respect
> to
> > the Polish corps.  The Polish Cavalry corps can't make it to Salzburg
> > without foraging, and the Polisch Infantry corps can't make it to
Salzburg
> > without force marching.  Do you want those 2 corps to move elsewhere, or
> do
> > you want to roll the forages?
> >
> > kdh
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 11:22 PM
> > Subject: RE: [eia] Prussian land phase- Nov 07
> >
> >
> > > Both Brunswick and Hohenloe are in Kassel.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> > > J.J. Young
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 9:57 AM
> > > To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> > > Subject: Re: [eia] Prussian land phase- Nov 07
> > >
> > >
> > > Did Brunswick stay in Kassel (where he would be in command over
> Hohenloe),
> > > or move to Lubeck ?
> > >
> > > -JJY
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "EiA" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 3:40 PM
> > > Subject: [eia] Prussian land phase- Nov 07
> > >
> > >
> > > > No depots removed or placed.
> > > >
> > > > 1 I Kassel -->Lubeck  {$1}
> > > > 1 I Hanover --> Hamburg  {$2}
> > > > 1 I holds in Kassel  {f 8-}
> > > > Saxons Brandenburg --> Hanover  {f 5-}
> > > > 1 I (w/ Hohen.)  Minden --> Kassel  {f 6-}
> > > > 1 I Hanover --> Kassel  {$2}
> > > > 2 I (w/ Blucher) Leopoldstadt --> Munich  {Austrian supply}
> > > > Polish Cav  Vienna --> Salzburg  {f 6-}
> > > > Polish Inf. Leopoldstadt --> Salzburg  {Austrian supply}
> > > > Total Cost= $5
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > P.S.  Kyle, does the garrison at Hamburg destroy the depot and
retreat
> > to
> > > > the city?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > eia mailing list
> > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia