Re: [eia] Turkish Land Orders (part II, revised), October 1807

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    Oh, I didn't realize you were using your unused movement.  I thought you
wanted to lay siege to Genoa.  I guess I got confused because some people
don't say in their orders whether they are using unused movement or not.
    So, to avoid mistakes like this in the future, let's all please say
explicitly when we are choosing *not* to use unused movement points.  That
way no one has to guess, and we don't have to rely on back-calculations to
figure out whether or not corps will have an opportunity to lay siege.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Turkish Land Orders (part II, revised), October 1807


> Thus spake "Kyle H":
> >     When I calculate your forage rolls I get different numbers.  The
forage
> > roll at Genoa should be 4-, not 5- (because Genoa's base value is 4).
The
> > forage roll at Florence should be 4- as well (base value is 5 + 1 for
unused
> > movement - 2 for corps already in the area = 4).  But since none of your
> > rolls was greater than 4, it doesn't matter.
> >
> > kdh
>
> I think the forage number at Genoa should be 5-. The base is 4, and my
> corps had 1 unused movement. You're right about the forage roll for
> Florence, though. I didn't take into account the Austrian corps that
> arrived before mine.
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia