Re: [eia] French reinforcements

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wouldn't the Piedmont corps that reinforced also have failed to do so ?
Both rolls were 2's.  This would have the effect of reducing the PP
gain/loss for the battle to +2 for Austria and -4 for France.  Is this
correct ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] French reinforcements


>     Yep, my mistake.  I misremembered the rule.  The French XI infantry
> corps should still be in the mountain area NW of Mantua.  Normally, you
> wouldn't know what its contents are, but since it's my mistake, that's my
> fault.
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jerald Jeffrey Young (CPS - Personal)" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:07 AM
> Subject: [eia] French reinforcements
>
>
> > Having gone back and checked, Everett is right.  It is the terrain that
> the
> > reinforcing force _starts_ in that modifies its attempt, not the
> destination
> > space.  So the rolls for the reinforcement attempts in the battle just
> > concluded should have been 1-.
> >
> > -JJY
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia