Re: [eia] Second Battle of Naples, July 1807

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    D'oh!  Sorry.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Second Battle of Naples, July 1807


> Thus spake menexenus@xxxxxxx:
> >    I am assuming that since no declaration was made prior to sending out
comb
> > at rolls, Joel
> > intended to keep Pechlivan's tactical rating at 4 (to get +1) rather
than dro
> > pping it to 3 (to make
> > Spain roll at -1).  Whether or not this was Joel's intention, it seems
to be
> > the only fair way to
> > handle the situation.  The default assumption must be that you are using
your
> >  commander's full
> > tactical rating unless you say otherwise.  Would the rest of you agree?
> >
> > kdh
>
> I never had the option of doing that. We both have corps in excess of our
> tactical maxima. My modified tactical rating is 3, and Spain's is 2.
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia