Re: [eia] limited access revisions

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not a good one to ask for an opinion on this suggestion, since GB would
be royally screwed by it immediately.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] limited access revisions


> Thus spake "J.J. Young":
> > Here's something to consider; maybe no seiges of cities in FET should be
> > allowed by _either_ side, former enemies or allies.  After all, the
owner of
> > the territory is no longer involved in the war, and wants its citizens
left
> > out of the fracas.  There's no reason why that restriction should apply
only
> > to the former enemy.  Kyle, would that help address the imbalance you
> > perceive ?  What do the rest of you think of this logic ?
> >
> > -JJY
>
> Why not prohibit corps in FET from retiring into cities? Presumably the
> city fathers would close the city gates if a battle were about to take
> place outside.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia