Re: [eia] An important point about Denmark !

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree that Eugene would end up outside Cherbourg with Massena.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] An important point about Denmark !


>     I have no right to complain since it was my mistake.  So now the
Denmark
> corps has 8 infantry/ 0 cavalry (as long as everyone else is agreeable).
>     So where does Eugene end up?  I guess he would have had to stay with
the
> corps he started with.  That corps went to Cherbourg.  So now Eugene and
> Massena are both at Cherbourg?  Is that consistent with what you were
> thinking, JJ?
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 10:49 AM
> Subject: [eia] An important point about Denmark !
>
>
> Actually, Eugene did not give the French +1 to their rolls- cav
superiority
> did.  Eugene gave the Danes -1 to their rolls.  So I say, recalculate the
> effects of the Danish rolls without the -1.  Which would cause:
>
> First round:  French suffer -1 I and -0.7 morale.
> Second round:  French suffer -1 I and -0.8 morale.
>
> Danes break.  Political losses/gains are the same as before.
>
> The added morale loss drops the French pursuit to class 4, and a roll of 3
> makes 15% of 3 cav factors = no loss.
>
> Does this sound fair to everyone ?
>
> -JJY
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia