James Helle on 30 Aug 2003 14:59:29 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] Russian Land Phase |
Correction: these were your March orders. I cannot locate your April orders, but I still show the depot in Vitebsk on my map. -----Original Message----- From: James Helle [mailto:jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 10:57 AM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: RE: [eia] Russian Land Phase Mike, doesn't a depot already exist at Vitebsk? In your April orders you removed a depot at Riga, then created one at Minsk and Vitebsk. -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael Gorman Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:07 PM To: eia@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [eia] Russian Land Phase France might well go first, but I can't see how we'll actually matter to each other. Depot Removal: Minsk Depot Creation: Vitebsk and Vilna($2) I'm going to pause here to give people a chance to disagree with me on how depot creation works. As far as I can tell, even though the supply source the depot north of Minsk is linked to changes from Minsk to Vitebsk, the fact that it existed at the beginning of the turn allows a depot to be added to its chain in Vilna. But, I can see how someone might disagree with me, so I'll stop and give a everyone a chance to disagree before I bother posting a bunch of orders that will change if this is not a proper set of depot orders. Mike _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia