James Helle on 30 Aug 2003 14:59:29 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] Russian Land Phase


Correction: these were your March orders.  I cannot locate your April
orders, but I still show the depot in Vitebsk on my map.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Helle [mailto:jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 10:57 AM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: RE: [eia] Russian Land Phase


Mike, doesn't a depot already exist at Vitebsk?  In your April orders you
removed a depot at Riga, then created one at Minsk and Vitebsk.

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Michael Gorman
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:07 PM
To: eia@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eia] Russian Land Phase


France might well go first, but I can't see how we'll actually matter to
each other.

Depot Removal: Minsk
Depot Creation: Vitebsk and Vilna($2)

I'm going to pause here to give people a chance to disagree with me on how
depot creation works.  As far as I can tell, even though the supply source
the depot north of Minsk is linked to changes from Minsk to Vitebsk, the
fact that it existed at the beginning of the turn allows a depot to be
added to its chain in Vilna.

But, I can see how someone might disagree with me, so I'll stop and give a
everyone a chance to disagree before I bother posting a bunch of orders
that will change if this is not a proper set of depot orders.

Mike


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia