J.J. Young on 26 Aug 2003 00:00:50 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Retreat rules |
I do not object to the proposed house rule, as long as a retreating army with _no_ unobstructed route is still retreated multiple spaces, and is not wiped out or anything like that. That would be too much of a departure from the rules for me. But I don't think that's what anyone's proposing; just checking. -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Retreat rules > Wow, here's another case of us just blindly playing the rules > incorrectly for a long, long time. Thanks for notifying us of the mistake, > Mike. I agree with you, though, that I think I prefer the way we have > already been doing things, i.e., armies are retreated via the shortest > *unobstructed* route to their nearest depot/capital. Can we just call this > a house rule and move on? Or would people like more discussion on this > issue? > > kdh > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:15 AM > Subject: [eia] Retreat rules > > > > I was reading over the retreat rules as I planned my next land phase and I > > think we've been doing them in a way that makes sense to me, but does not > > follow the rules. From what I can see, forces always retreat towards > their > > closest depot, or lacking any placed depots, towards their closest > > capital. If the way is blocked, they don't take an alternate route, they > > just retreat multiple spaces. > > We've been having troops retreat along the shortest unobstructed path but > > to always go one space when possible. > > So, for example, if I rolled a force around to Brest-Litovsk and then > > defeated Blucher, how we've been playing, with Grodno and Brest-Litovsk > > containing enemy forces, Blucher would retreat to the swamp space south of > > him one space away. But reading the rules, I think they say he should be > > retreated to the northern space of West Galacia or the space between > Grodno > > and Koniogsberg. > > And as I think about it, last turn when Prussia actually did have to > > retreat. I would have had the choice of the space he went to, or sending > > him to Grodno and then onto Brest-Litovsk since Grodno is occupied by a > > force that isn't a garrison without a depot. > > This would seriously alter the dynamics in retreats and what you can do to > > a force in retreat or withdraw. > > > > Mike > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > eia mailing list > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia