Re: [eia] Map error

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On a second rereading of the Prussian orders for 10/06, I agree with Kyle
that no mistake was made.  But it's all academic, right ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Map error


>     Yes, but you failed to quote your land orders (which come after
> reinforcement orders).  After you placed Blucher at Berlin, you then said
to
> move the infantry corps at Berlin to Stettin.  Since you made this move
> *before* the corps from Wittenberg moved to Berlin, there was no choice
but
> to move Blucher with the corps.  (A leader cannot be left behind without
any
> corps to command.)
>
>     Anyway, it doesn't matter now since all of your corps are back in
Berlin
> with Blucher as you intended.  In the future, though, it might help if you
> say which corps your leaders are with in your land orders.  That would
avoid
> this kind of misunderstanding.
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "EiA" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:47 PM
> Subject: [eia] Map error
>
>
> > REINFORCEMENTS:
> > ** A new Prussian infantry corps is formed in Kustrin {which immediately
> > absorb the two garrison factors there}.
> > ** Blucher appears in Berlin.
> > ** A cavalry corps appears in Warsaw. (A transfered factor justifies its
> > existence)
> >
> > As my october orders show, Blucher should be in Berlin.  The current map
> > shows him in Stettin.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia