Joel Uckelman on 12 Jul 2003 03:06:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Turkish Land Phase, September 1806 |
Thus spake "J.J. Young": > Here is a direct quote from a communication between London and > Constantinople, dated 6/30/03 (real calendar): > "I will pay for supply of your troops in Italy as long as they remain on > British (or Austrian) territory. However, I cannot pay for their supply if > they move into Naples." > > Great Britain had stated clearly to the Ottoman Empire (in August, game > calendar) that it would be willing to pay for supply of the Turkish cavalry > corps in Italy as long as they remained on British or Austrian-controlled > territory, but _not_ on Spanish-controlled territory. Such an action would > be a violation of our stated position of neutrality in the Spanish-Ottoman > war. Moreover, Britain was not asked beforehand about supply for this move > by the Turks. Therefore, Great Britain _does_not_ agree to pay the $3 for > supply to the Turkish cavalry corps attacking Naples. This corps will have > to forage or change its orders. > > The British government regrets being placed in this awkward position, and > intends no hostility towards its Turkish ally. We repeat, however, that > this refusal is not a "backtracking", but simply following through on a > policy clearly stated earlier. > > God Save the King ! I had understood from our last communication that you would pay for supply on my way out. If that's not the case, then I need to rewrite my orders. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia