Re: [eia] History monkey report: Battle of Tripoli

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I was just going by what Joel reported.  What say you, Turkey ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] History monkey report: Battle of Tripoli


> At 10:40 AM 5/3/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >So the way I read it, Tripolitania suffers -0.5 morale and -1 I in the
first
> >round; -1.1 morale and breaks in the second round, losing -1 C.  There is
no
> >pursuit since the Turks have no cavalry.  Turkey loses a total of -1.5
> >morale and -2 I (I assume feudal infantry, right, Joel ?).
> >
> >Turkey gains +1 PP and France loses -1 PP.  Turkey now chooses where to
> >retreat the Tripolitania corps.
> >
> >-JJY
>
> My records show the 2nd Anatolian being a cav corps that was destroyed
> early in the year.  I also show the only available Anatolian corps being
> the 3rd, which is feudal cavalry, not infantry.
>
> Which would mean a pursuit is entirely possible and likely to hurt.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia