Re: [eia] where are we?

J.J. Young on 3 May 2003 02:31:01 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] where are we?

To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] where are we?
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 22:29:33 -0400
References: <200305021613.h42GDsNN011587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1051899556.3eb2b6a472c07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <007701c310e5$c4187c00$4d90570c@KylesDell4500>

>     Of course, if Britain's and Spain's land phases are combined, then so
> are their naval phases.  But I guess it doesn't matter much since they
would
> go back-to-back anyway.

Right.  We were aware that our naval phases were combined, and we assumed
everybody else knew, too.  It just didn't have any affect on what happened.

-JJY


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] where are we?
  - From: Everett E. Proctor

References:
- Re: [eia] where are we?
  - From: jjy
- Re: [eia] where are we?
  - From: Kyle H

Prev by Date: Re: [eia] Austrian Ally Access
Next by Date: [eia] Spanish Naval Phase (Oct. 05)
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] where are we?
Next by thread: Re: [eia] where are we?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread