Re: [eia] repatriating after this war?

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Yeah, sorry.  This is the dilemma you face when you have a large backlog
of unread emails:  do you reply to an email that you know was written over
24 hours ago, or do you not reply (knowing that you may forget to do so if
you don't do it now)?  In this case, I obviously made the wrong decision.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] repatriating after this war?


> Thus spake "Kyle H":
> >     I guess I have to object, because I have not had an opportunity to
read
> > through all the 12.4 emails yet.  So just because you haven't heard from
me
> > about your newest proposals doesn't mean that I consent to them.
> >
> > kdh
>
> I wasn't assuming you had. That's why we reverted to using force
> repatriation for now.
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia