|
This change would be OK with me, since it's where
garrison factors have to go, anyway. Why should the corps go somewhere
radically different ?
Another question; is going to the territory of
an ally (with access) optional, or mandatory, if the ally's territory is closer
? For example, I have a factor of Danish I in garrison at Viborg.
Must it go to Sveaborg, or could it go to the closest British-controlled city
(probably Christianna, although I haven't counted carefully, yet).
For that matter, this example applies to my corps,
too.
-JJY
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 10:41
AM
Subject: Re: [eia] question about
repatriation
I would say that
"friendly-controlled" would include allies, as long as those allies grant
access. So since you have an access agreement with Spain, the British
troops could be relocated to Sveaborg. However, suppose that Spain
suddenly decided to break its access agreement with GB. Would GB really
be forced to repatriate to the Arctic Circle? That seems rather silly to
me. So is anyone opposed to a rules-change that says forces are
repatriated to the nearest friendly-controlled *city* space? That seems
more realistic.
kdh
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 10:25
AM
Subject: [eia] question about
repatriation
If Britain made peace with Russia right now,
where the hell would my forces be repatriated ? The rule says that my
corps are placed in the nearest area of a friendly proivince or minor
country. Does friendly only mean controlled by Britain, or could
it mean controlled by one of Britain's allies ? This makes a big
difference, because the closest area on the map which is in my territory is
the northernmost area at the tip of the frozen, rocky tundra of Norway
!!! Why would my troops decide this was the place to go to party after
peace is declared ?!
-JJY
|