Danny Mount on 9 Apr 2003 20:02:00 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] political points after a battle |
I agree with Mike, I think it is considered one army as well and should split the difference. -DEM -----Original Message----- From: eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael Gorman Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 2:09 PM To: eia@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [eia] political points after a battle At 10:22 PM 4/8/2003 -0400, you wrote: >This interpretation of how allies lose PPs in battle would change Spain's >and GB's political status. Since we each had 2 corps participating in the >first battle of St. P (when Russia lifted the siege), Spain and GB should >only have lost -1 PP each, not -2 PP. At the time, Mike must have been >going by the same interpretation I originally had. > >So Spain and GB should both be one higher on the political status chart. >Would everyone agree ? > >-JJY I find this interpretation quite odd as in all other ways a combined force is considered one army. To now split them into two armies seems very strange. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia