Danny Mount on 9 Apr 2003 20:02:00 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] political points after a battle


I agree with Mike, I think it is considered one army as well and should
split the difference.
-DEM

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Michael Gorman
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 2:09 PM
To: eia@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [eia] political points after a battle


At 10:22 PM 4/8/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>This interpretation of how allies lose PPs in battle would change Spain's
>and GB's political status.  Since we each had 2 corps participating in the
>first battle of St. P (when Russia lifted the siege), Spain and GB should
>only have lost -1 PP each, not -2 PP.  At the time, Mike must have been
>going by the same interpretation I originally had.
>
>So Spain and GB should both be one higher on the political status chart.
>Would everyone agree ?
>
>-JJY
I find this interpretation quite odd as in all other ways a combined force
is considered one army.  To now split them into two armies seems very
strange.




_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia



_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia