Re: [eia] Battle of Rome results

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 10:53 AM 3/23/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> At 08:57 AM 3/23/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > OK, so the modified British rolls were 3, 3, 2 (originally 4, 4, 3), and the
> > modified French rolls were 5, 3, 2 (originally 4, 2, 1).
> >
> > First round:  Britain inflicts -1 casualty (10 %) and -0.7 morale on the
> > French.  France inflicts -2 casualties (15%) and -1.4 morale on the British.
> >
> > Second round:  Britain inflicts -1 casualty (10 %) and -1.4 morale on the
> > French.  France inflicts -1 casualty (10%) and -1.4 morale on the British.
> >
> > Third round:  Britain inflicts -1 casualty (5%) and -1.0 morale on the
> > French.  The French inflict -1 casualty (5%) and -1.0 morale on the British.
> >
> > The British break and retreat to the mountain area due north; there is no
> > pursuit.  Britain loses -2 PP and France gains +2 PP.
> >
> > Total losses are 2 British I, 1 British C, 1 Port. I, 2 French I, and 1
> > Naples I.
> >
> > Since the attacking corps used depot supply, the French now have the option
> > of besieging Rome.
>
> If the Portugese corps retired into the city, how is it involved in the 
> field battle?
Sorry, misread JJ's earlier email.  Thought he retired the whole corps and 
not just the garrison.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia