jjy on 21 Mar 2003 15:35:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] cossacks |
I think the purpose of forcing that cossack to retreat was to unblock that space for supply purposes. That was the effect, anyway. -JJY Quoting Kyle H <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I don't know about everyone else, but I had forgotten how cossacks work > when they are by themselves. So, as a public service, I figured I'd remind > everyone (including myself). 10.1.2.2.3 says that cossacks always get to > retreat automatically unless the attacking force has a cavalry corps with > them. And then they still have a 2/3 chance of retreating. > So the moral of the story is: there's not much point in trying to hunt > them down, because they will almost always get away from you. > > kdh > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Gorman > To: eia@xxxxxxxxx > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 8:32 PM > Subject: Re: [eia] New Prussian land orders-Aug. 1805 > > > At 06:08 PM 3/20/2003 -0800, you wrote: > > Depots Created- Danzig $1 > Depots Destroyed- Posen > > French corps B-L to east of W. Galicia f/a > I corps in Minsk beseiges the city $2 > I corps in Warsaw moves to east of W. Galicia $1 > I corps in Warsaw moves to east of W. Galicia $1 > I corps in B-L moves east of W Galicia (w/ Hohenloe) $1 > I corps in B-L holds (w/ Brunswick) f/a > I corps in Minsk moves to Grodno $1 > Saxon corps in Warsaw drops two garrisons and moves to > Lithuania and engages cossacks there $1 > > > P.S. I'm really sorry about the delay guys, but I've been putting in 15 > hour days this last week and just havn't devoted the time to writing up my > new orders. > > > The cossack retreats to Vilna. The siege will require a siege roll. > > Mike > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia