Re: [eia] Turkish Economic Phase, June 1805

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

A cossack is "a cavalry factor for all purposes", so Mike is correct that
Turkey should lose the money and manpower for Armenia and, in fact, should
have lost it last economic turn as well, if memory serves correctly.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Turkish Economic Phase, June 1805


> Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> >
> >          Umm, Turkey has a base income/manpower of $23 and 12 manpower.
It
> > should be down $7 and 3 manpower from occupied provincial capitals for a
> > taxation base of $16 and a pre-manipulation manpower of 9.
>
> I count my loss at $5/1. At Erzurum, there's only a cossack, and only
> factors prevent taxation, so I should be able to collect from Armenia. In
> Bessarabia, I see no Russian forces at all. Is there a garrison at Ismail
> that I don't have on my map?
>
> > If you included
> > Palestine in your base values, and it looks like you did, you should
then
> > go up to $18 and 11 manpower, 6 after manipulation.  Palestine doesn't
give
> > double money and manpower as it is not a free state.
>
> I know---I was counting it at face value. What we differ on is whether I
> collect taxes and manpower from Armenia and Bessarabia.
>
> >          I also show four Turkish depots on the map that have to be paid
> > for in the maintenance phase.
>
> There are no Turkish depots on the map. I removed all four in my land
> phase: http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/eia/eia-200212/msg00239.html
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia