menexenus on 2 Dec 2002 21:30:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Battle of Salonika, May 1805 |
For the record, I agree with Joel. Withdrawal is generally a one shot deal. Either you get away or you don't. The thing with Outflank is just an exception to that rule. (And it makes pretty good sense. The pinning force in an Outflank maneuver isn't doing much more than a force engaged in a Probe maneuver. Basically, if the withdrawing troops don't run into the flanking force, then they should be able to get away.) kdh > > The reason I think there is supposed to be is that in the outflank rules, > > withdrawal is automatic on the second round if the flanking force does not > > arrive. It's possible that is just for the specific case of an outflank > > though. > > > > Mike > > I took this to be an exception for outflank only. Resolution of all three > rounds of combat occurs in the combat step, and the withdraw step is well > before that. > > -- > J. > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia