Joel Uckelman on 5 Nov 2002 04:52:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Peace of Munich ? |
Thus spake "J.J. Young": > Well, whatever. I was just trying to avoid making any of the Coalition > powers feel left out, since there's no place where all three are gathered. > Also, there is precedent for a peace treaty to be signed on the loser's > ground, such as the 2 Peaces of Paris that ended (and then reended, after > Waterloo) the Napoleonic wars. On top of that, one of the Coalition powers > will get to choose "corps on loan" as a peace condition, which it seems most > likely will be one of the corps in Munich. But hey, I've tried to make my > points, and I'm willing to call the thing whatever the consensus decides. Hmm. Well, it's not as though I care terribly much, just trying to keep myself occupied. :) -- J. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia