jhelle on 7 Aug 2002 22:37:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Economic Phase |
> I agree breaking these up into smaller steps is a good idea Since Mike is right that all money and manpower that a country might >receive (without loans) is visible on the board, I have no objection to >sending out public summaries of those numbers, just so people can >double-check their own work. Anything that helps avoid a mistake is a good >thing in my book. And as far as I can tell, there's no rule against doing >so for anyone who is ambitious enough to give it a try... > About steps H-J: I'm not sure what to think there. On the one hand, I >can see that, while Russia and Turkey are at war, you might want to handle >the Levy Step simultaneously. On the other hand, as you know, I'm generally >against anything that adds extra steps or extra emails. Hmmm... > Well, I guess the lesson of the past week or so has been not to be so >caught up in avoiding extra steps. So sure, if you want we could have two >Economic Phases. Economic Phase I would be steps A-G, and each country >could send in its reports whenever. Economic Phase II would correspond to >steps H-J and could be done by escrow. (BTW, for those who may not know, >the steps of the economic phase have been lettered on the inside (pg. 2) of >the quick reference card.) > However, while we are adding sub-phases, I think we should consider >breaking up the Political Phase as well. For instance, in the March >political phase, because I was unaware that war was about to be declared on >me, I chose to make Wurttemburg a free state. If I had been aware of the >fact that two more countries were about to declare war, I probably wouldn't >have made that move. Hence, I propose breaking up the Political Phase as >well. My suggestion would be that steps B-E should be Political Phase I and >steps F-I should be Political Phase II. The first of these steps would need >to be done by escrow, the second one wouldn't *have* to be, but it would >probably still be a good idea. > I suppose there is not quite the same need to break up the Political >Phase as there is to break up the Economic Phase, but I figure that it is >already essentially broken up anyway, in that we all wait to do the Minor >Country Control step until after everyone has sent their Political Phase >orders. So why not break it up in a way that makes a little more sense, and >gives people the information that they should already have when making >decisions later on in the Political Phase? > >Let me know what you think. > >kdh > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 1:45 AM >Subject: [eia] Economic Phase > > >> JJ has already said he is going to send out a post with that he calculates >> as the trade incomes for each nation. Do we want to have a post of the >> money and manpower collection phase? The numbers are all visible on the >> map, so anyone who wants to take the time to add up the numbers will know >> the income of any other nation. A posting with what everyone is getting >> could avoid calculation errors and make sure we all agree on the >> accounting. We don't want any WorldCOMs or Enrons in our game! >> However, if people want to make anyone interested in their economy go do >> the math themselves, I can get behind that too. >> >> As far as the later part of the Economic Phase, like steps H thru J. Do >> people want that escrowed? I can see it being possible that knowing one >> country is going to cede a minor to another might have an impact on what >> units you purchase and the ceding step is supposed to occur simultaneously >> in face to face games. I don't think it's big deal and I'm perfectly >happy >> to have us just post the public stuff that isn't being centrally >> determined, like victory points and PSA adjustment, as we figure it >> out. However, I think we should decide if we want to have simultaneous >> release of those later phases or if we just don't think it's going to >matter. >> >> Mike >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> eia mailing list >> eia@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia >> > >_______________________________________________ >eia mailing list >eia@xxxxxxxxx >http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia