Kyle H on 28 Jul 2002 18:45:03 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] two rules interpretation questions


    Thanks, Jim.  I appreciate your honesty.  :-)

kdh

> >Here are my opinions:
>     1)  Yes, I think you have to maintain occupation to conquer a
> country.  I dropped a garrison in lubeck in Feb. while moving
> corps just for the purpose of maintaining occupation.
>     2)  Even though JJ may disagree, I admit Kyle has a point
> about telling armies apart on the battlefield.  I have personally
> been there and know that each country has not only different
> uniforms but different equipment also that is easily recognizable
> with very little training.  My vote is that coalition forces
> should be broken down by nationality.{sorry JJ}
>     
> >_______________________________________________
> >eia mailing list
> >eia@xxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia