Re: [eia] up and running

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 08:23 PM 7/19/02 -0400, you wrote:
>    
> Hello all.  I seem to be back up and running.  Could someone
> please send me the link to the archive?  Thanks.  Also, I'm
> attaching a few images.  One is my best recollection of the minor
> country status, one is my record of the political status display, and the
> third is a map.  Could you all just briefly look at these documents
> and see if you notice anything wrong with them.  (I'm sure there are
> mistakes.  I just need you to help me find them.)
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> kdh
>

        

I
show the Bavarian corps at 2I and 2C rather than 3I and 3C.  I
expect one of us either forgot or double counted a forage loss or
something.

        

The
impacts of the current political phase don't appear to be on the PSA
track, so I'm not sure how much to say about it.

        

I show the
Vizier having an infantry and a cavalry corps in Egypt and the other
infantry corps in Jerusalem with the Syria corps.

        

I show
Pechlivan Khan with the Cavalry corps east of Constantinople

        

Turkey
should have control of Tunisia.  Joel still needs to send the setup
orders for them.  Prussia and Austria can't win control of it even
if they could roll a 7 since they're allied with Spain.  As France
and Russia have denied control, Turkey wins as the only interested power
not allied with Spain.

        

        

I figure
Joel can tell us which one is correct for the positions of the Turkish
forces and leaders and anyone who has been keeping track, like JJ, can
figure out which is correct for the Bavaria Corps.

Mike