Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C

Christopher Smith on 2 Jul 2003 18:44:01 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C

To: alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C
From: Christopher Smith <x@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Jul 2003 11:40:37 -0700
In-reply-to: <1057170517.2332.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030702144318.15334.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <32836.12.224.171.52.1057165655.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1057165903.2332.22.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33353.12.224.171.52.1057169933.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1057170517.2332.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 11:28, Christopher Smith wrote:
> Ah! It seems like you are intending to still use the standard heap
> allocator. That will make it pretty hard for the mark/sweep allocator to
> win. Half the fun mark/sweep is having heap allocs that are almost as
> fast as stack allocs.

I took a quick peek at the implementation. Wasn't quite as sophisticated
as I expected. This will definitely have a hard time matching smart
pointers. :-(

--Chris
_______________________________________________
alacpp mailing list
alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp

References:
- [ALACPP] smart pointers in C
  - From: Josh Dybnis
- Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C
  - From: arlo
- Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C
  - From: Christopher Smith
- Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C
  - From: arlo
- Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C
  - From: Christopher Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C
Next by Date: Re: [ALACPP] C++ GC (was smart pointers in C)
Previous by thread: Re: [ALACPP] smart pointers in C
Next by thread: Re: [ALACPP] C++ GC (was smart pointers in C)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread