arlo on 1 Jul 2003 14:51:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [ALACPP] hot or not? |
> Of course. So, you agree with the idea of giving monostate a smart pointer > interface? I've always thought smart pointers were the right abstraction to use to encapsulate any memory management issues. Since that's basically what Monostate is, I think it's a great idea. Hadn't thought of it m'self, but it fits well. The really nice thing about such an approach is that I make sure all dynamic memory objects are in smart pointers. Thus, if I want to change the monostate from a monostate to a "normal" object, I just have to change the typedef to a different type of smart pointer (and then put instances somewhere). Arlo _______________________________________________ alacpp mailing list alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp