| Jon Stewart on 27 Jun 2003 00:05:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [ALACPP] hot or not? |
> I thought about implicit type conversion. operator T*() is equivalent to > operator->() and I can't get operator T&() to compile -- anyone know why? > It's what I really want. Then your MonoState usage looks like this: Err... operator T*() is NOT equivalent to operator->(), as operator->() has the requirement that the pointer must be bound to a member. D'oh. It turns out, though, that I kind of like that guarantee. Jon -- Jon Stewart stew1@xxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ alacpp mailing list alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp