|
Charles Walker on Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:47:57 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] nday 2: The State of Play
|
- To: spoon-discuss <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] nday 2: The State of Play
- From: Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 21:47:52 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dDFrh4iHt/UYXdCgsN6dhNxrlfkMD40QIyOnGy4dFdA=; b=FxPqH+tvXv1VCUgjG7c2SyU0qO29O5EY9POYeJjUi1CpG/GFTLVG7BbFia5x7lzkfZ u5AWanSJAc0RQTjswR1yB3Bbda4X1X3Y9tD/si1MhgZ0lhvc5YwUPVHOc0SO+d4sTrBA vkpBpO8oU/B7YH0fAH7LoPemMSTlUqxGvOiFo4lDUhvewv+/cR/Pdqh2R4I5zyKwRSIW yIuma0QcZshtHFQJpNlxlQn7BbyquiojFCFO/qv+raZCkvbj3KdD/MgW+vC/t46XJidz f7nOiLz3gN0HzNDBVYlorlsB9pbZg6ypQjJkpiOi1DjFziJcsKFoeGGBhl5WR5TsyC6T rZHQ==
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1308241337130.13300@hymn01.u.washington.edu>
- References: <CAKHvu=08EnF3mUW_vVKR2t3ASGugvVkNQ3kc1mTWC=xeP4PZgg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1308241337130.13300@hymn01.u.washington.edu>
On 24 Aug 2013 21:38, "Kerim Aydin" <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Jamie Ahloy Dallaire wrote:
> > I agree with comex. turing.py certainly -can- pass at least "a" Turing
Test
> > of some sort, at least once in 10^something times.
>
> The rule itself can be read either "there is at least one
> carefully constructed Turing Test that turing.py can pass" OR
> "turing.py can [in general] pass a generally reasonable version
> of a Turing Test".
I had been thinking something closer to the latter... something something
common sense mumble mumble.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss