Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal

Alexander Smith on Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:26:01 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal
From: Alexander Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:08:24 +0000
In-reply-to: <CACED6m=kwbmu5tPKCKLd8YV=aVN0QPgFsdaxXF+c9Ga_9sSHsw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: University of Birmingham
References: <CACED6mnr0H8uNMw496VNUx7Bbuj3h4gV-YS_To=EG=9mobg8Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP=UV6oN3SVCZwYtQ+pBwG+kJLwQ658+DGV9c93hghN_WWapZA@mail.gmail.com> <CACED6m=kwbmu5tPKCKLd8YV=aVN0QPgFsdaxXF+c9Ga_9sSHsw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1

On 26/02/13 13:31, Geoffrey Spear wrote:

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If this passes, what are the rules?


What do you mean, "passes"? Rule 0 says the Proposal itself may do
things to the ruleset, it doesn't say it needs to be passed first.


This scam is ridiculous, even by B standards :)

As such, we must clearly assume that it worked.

--
ais523
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] emergency?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread