Arkady English on Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:14:13 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset


On 20 September 2012 17:06, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Such as? A neutral party is required to receive moves (which are made
>> secretly) and publish them at the very least. I don't think the game
>> works at all without a Sec. gen.
>>
>
> Something like this:
>
> In the event the Sec. Gen has not fulfilled his duties in a timely fashion
> (defined herein as within X time frame), the players shall elect from their
> number a new Sec. Gen. Upon assumption of the role of Sec. Gen, the
> player's territories become neutral.

The concept of a "neutral territory" does not exist yet. I'll add this
because it's a good idea, but change "territories" to "units".
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss