Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Has anyone attempted to use the ontological argument to prove that we exist under a working B ruleset?

- 0x44

On Sep 3, 2012, at 13:44, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 16:39 -0400, Luke Sciarappa wrote:
>> In accordance with rule 14/7, this entity, identified by Dindane, requests
>> to become a Player.
> 
> Under which ruleset? Long experience has shown that no mater what
> ruleset you think B currently has, you're probably wrong.
> 
> It's generally believed that B's current ruleset is one in which no
> actions can be taken ever again. It'd be great to be proved wrong,
> though.
> 
> -- 
> ais523
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss