Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fwd: Initial Rules Set / Meta-Game

Geoffrey Spear on Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:12:35 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fwd: Initial Rules Set / Meta-Game - An Experiment in Thought Gaming

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fwd: Initial Rules Set / Meta-Game - An Experiment in Thought Gaming
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:05:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAO56fiPeha0RZOxF8TriJ0ZZD4mJwA7YWRz5YVSH6=4gOWk7Eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO56fiNtM1zJY7YSXrbz=pL8UnbMM6LmXrZa4TX986tQLL=wCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO56fiN_rwW3kEpz5Xx=Uf=LotO2wZCipkq53MToJ+bSivHCCw@mail.gmail.com> <4E5A7887.4090007@socal.rr.com> <CAO56fiPeha0RZOxF8TriJ0ZZD4mJwA7YWRz5YVSH6=4gOWk7Eg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Rainbow Wolfe
<rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Okay, so we want to stick with the convention of super legalistic then"? :)

Suggesting that players shouldn't actually have the right to change
and amend rules seems fairly reasonable :P
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fwd: Initial Rules Set / Meta-Game - An Experiment in Thought Gaming
  - From: Rainbow Wolfe

Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fwd: Initial Rules Set / Meta-Game - An Experiment in Thought Gaming
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fwd: Initial Rules Set / Meta-Game - An Experiment in Thought Gaming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread