|
Elliott Hird on Tue, 10 May 2011 12:27:59 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] Suggested new ruleset
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] Suggested new ruleset
- From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:27:53 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=s7uecFvcXyYNhbLf0oXhM9JinwkbUJgKBa9zjN+l6XA=; b=e+OUlggfBsUO1JK5jdzYcQjMvh0CSHVD9FylsKriJlYAbbB8M+cZgD/lrFR0vGTSJz vQ+N0pLpkpgdN+jzMfP9A7AY/63fOaIw6+4r1MbdKVACZz4HwLN5CDDP2Xi5sUsLTEIL dY5OeV8xIKgPc2e2Be8pFLsTUaoQy+Lj7eroc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HFnEfB/p/FnPrHBhVCwVFhDfOrH8wA54Wuj/NQXKoMWMEBDJnw9E+G3+Jgb2dM+NJf YDkzrmg7R+qyjzzlDZWzIO05r0rwifPv3VIXA+SXioihLyKT9kk6YCjyl3vY9wNcSwz/ x+4eU251oj2csyStYVrpMxh97WmO4Hyqc0XeU=
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTimhTrWAT=dbEUwvXiEm2UUdrbNQJA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <BANLkTi=G23ozMbpd2emXNpC54NhEahz3Uw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=8YkGBd+Q78A3cpaweG89Dt50x5g@mail.gmail.com> <1304970856.2059.19.camel@desert> <BANLkTi=2mZOkj9JbvN9WzxO7P8fx5WO07Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikFY0ziov2o-7jhkangQxsawRxW4w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikaW8a1Rg+rPkgXqpzP9XWuanBHMA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=e=XLY_c-Qc7thMg8t+MWw=Un=fg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimhTrWAT=dbEUwvXiEm2UUdrbNQJA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10 May 2011 20:18, Jonathan Rouillard <jonathan.rouillard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Srue, every player should see the RP submissions, but...
>
>> anybody can distribute a list of Refresh Proposals,
>> identified by their author, to a majority of players.
>
> Doesn't that mean that the final list doesn't have to be distributed
> to every player? Sure, it's not game-breaking - and even then, it
> wouldn't be a "problem". But still, it feels odd. =P
Indeed. I'm trying to keep with the "informal" style of this ruleset;
I mean, with it, the game can change just because one person starts
/thinking/ something else.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss