M P Darke on Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:14:33 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFI: deregistration


Surely, though, that causes the CFI to be non-existant, as only players can submit CFIs (if a literal reading of Rule 125/6 is taken). Therefore, the only acceptable answers are "false" and "refused".

--- On Thu, 3/3/11, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [s-b] CFI: deregistration
To: "B Nomic Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, 3 March, 2011, 14:48


I CFI on "Deregister is a synonym of Forfeit", with JamesB as the Defendant.

Plaintiff's Arguments:
{{
We all know what compsciguy meant, and eir right to forfeit the game
at any time would be violated by failing to allow em to forfeit my
making a public message that e reasonably expected to cause em to
forfeit.
}}

Resolution:
{{
compsciguy ceases to be a Player.  The gamestate is set to what it
would be if he had forfeited as of the moment e sent a message
purporting to "deregister".
}}

-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss