Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement

0x44 on Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:20:16 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:20:08 -0500
In-reply-to: <293407.61608.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <SNT109-W828825E44EA6BE1E5DF3E85940@xxxxxxx> <81462393-0E33-44D1-AADF-F5A0116889F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <D4246B50-2DCD-4B5C-8FF8-3E69EA45D2C6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <293407.61608.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Aug 9, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Gabriel Vistica wrote:

> And since I have a potential conflict of interest in the CFI below, I will 
> simply present an argument to Judge teucer:
> The Minister of Default NEVER becomes the Minister of a vacant Ministry, except 
> by announcement. The Minister of Default merely performs the duties of the 
> vacant ministry.

>From the text of rule 83 

"If the Victim forfeits the game or the ministry otherwise becomes vacant, then the Minister of Default immediately also becomes the Minister of Crime."


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement
  - From: James Baxter

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: [s-d] [Oracle] CFI 127
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread