Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.

Craig Daniel on Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:07:03 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:06:59 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=YJfLAfOeFxgSS/6IB9I87syWlgXozyZ6LKDkgAtDLvc=; b=hB95hcQSp2DaEaZfsKmDT4+kt2OM/BPb+Eoi7DoGYqnBaP/RvFzxBg1sHThlpq1LZi GIghP1T971yD0mRTK/QDRAXHa/2/xfabnjyBUio7NisIjExVHqu+iFfDL2u5gxaMxCpm 344UHIU+Q7dV6TG2jCkjgPs/HzSfeF9kVP+d0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=J8I8nzE5vFUKOBO2DPWaiApX1ZrbsjpOQQiiW7yXIKeEeMLdhCcorcGQvg2WeTirdp XhiqbgoIQ69gOuH3TaIh2teOmHIT9/9coJ/HD6c14q0kiC2He8HzDcCG1RoXVsR+Qp+/ k+0GIjYX/DYI/KMc8+76LWx52WUABfJk9oelo=
In-reply-to: <224397.45791.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4C4C6065.5030901@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <341751.69189.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikcyxHs06T3q+n6qSPE3biH9uBJpfb-OdxiV2Z4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <224397.45791.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Did I miss an email or something? When did 0x44 get assigned to hear the appeal?

He hasn't been yet, but he's the only person who can be.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
  - From: M P Darke
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
  - From: Gabriel Vistica

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread