James Baxter on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:28:25 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 123


> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:47:21 -0400
> From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 123
> 
> >
> >
> > You're the Plaintiff so you can't have been assigned, that means my statement unambiguously refers to the player known as
> > compsciguy who is not the Plaintiff.
> 
> False. The Plaintiff is Murphy, and did not specify a Defendant.


Ah, OK. I was thinking of CFI 122 and I misread the quote when I checked. This multiple names thing is complicated. 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss