Craig Daniel on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:34:15 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 109


On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> teucer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:00 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I got around that, by specifying that you were, and I quote "identified as Craig Daniel". Nothing was said about
>>> nicknames.
>>
>> Identified by whom? No part of the gamestate identifies me as Craig Daniel.
>
> By the From: line of all your recent e-mails.  Even B only overrides
> moron-in-a-hurry (*) when the rules explicitly say so, right?

Right, and that's what I'm trying to assert (by reductio ad absurdam):
the fact that I misordered the digits in Marrwhatsit's nickname does
not mean I failed to name em as a defendant.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss