Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proto - Revive Our Ancient Heritage

[Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

2009/12/4 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Charles Walker
> <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2009/12/3 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Replace the ruleset with that found in the attached text file. Replace
>>> the string (DATE) in Rule 72 with the current date, without updating
>>> Rule 72's revision number.
>>
>> This would fail; under the current ruleset rulechanges must be
>> sequential, not simultaneous.
>
> That's a good point. Any suggested tweaks?

I might be tempted to remove the simultaneousness requirement at the
beginning of the proposal, and then continue as you had already
written it.

>>> Set all players' gnome holdings as follows:
>>
>> I think you forgot the holdings here, but I would use some exchange
>> rate so players get a number of gnomes related to how many gnomes they
>> had before the adoption of the RP. Also I would make sure that the
>> proposal destroys all Gnomes before this as they may continue to exist
>> because of the current rule 32.
>
> Yeah. I had been thinking half the current number, with Barley becoming Grain.

That sounds fair.

>>> Set the publicity of spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx to Public and of all
>>> other fora to Private.
>>
>> What about discussion fora? Probably include ##nomic as well as spoon-discuss.
>
> The ruleset in question distinguishes only two types of Forum, Public
> and Private. A Private Forum is one that is not Public.

Oh, I didn't think to check that. Fair enough.

-- 
Charles Walker
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss