Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah

Craig Daniel on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:13:25 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:13:21 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=h9jw/K8NaZX8xcYVWBe0qOl5DvS2zL57xUv7qLz29ow=; b=c5LHAUnGNJ8HALc4w9ae/R7PWvz5L+ASWhtfLL0/gyMbhKQBvF/bTSMy8rn5RwOpZV ptpTAB6KH069o6tpCl0qR51hnHFWzkUwSKFAAQUMbu34SWfYTX8MsGZnuuFShq0M8kZz 8E8liDzrPBJhMWjy8zkH6tn59FNx2q0XpLICQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=fKSkfXW5pq2G+ZZZEYwW0tjfc5EMU9LNMt/6zLvIQqhHYRpFELby4nCufRfSPqtBfg 8zdUS66K8UbhksdCtvahf0j+ZWaPRbB/y/FOsbxbiM7hUMwejOlpdlZGLl8upAbBT46P 3gdaJjNzxSKcu1xkvRBBlCUCRVKg9ouv25oEs=
In-reply-to: <653283240911091053t7878496saa878571c6415853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240911090754j2d770bbcw64cc15a806618188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0911091040p4848592ch7a29543d06951e03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911091044m4e75983dr3077ca8b28652801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20911091046x588a5e44q17c2723f53a05ed8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911091053t7878496saa878571c6415853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> proto-proto: Bring back Consultations, with Oracularities that go into
>>> effect when they become Pondered. Keep something analogous to our
>>
>> Proto: Oracularities take effect only with Bn Consent.
>
> Pondering was like Bn consent, except that if no one bothers to make a
> declaration of consistency it passes.

Yeah, but adding an old game mechanic back in when we now have one
that does the same thing seems silly, and not silly in a "you're all
fucking nuts" way.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Charles Walker

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Charles Walker
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread