Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah

Charles Walker on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:56:35 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
From: Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:56:30 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=H4n8T5qM1jTq1j2xTSUqOoJ6OnLQusmDO5JZHQByDTk=; b=Z9HM9AOCpGlZQ8dH2jtze3OcVVnQ2Ue+MoV0bNTUuhF7mAED5vVeDNPYaRZL05uXBD OUIxZy0tGVRTmhFG40grae9Ng7ADriD5DCmzv3bn9bvVcJK+iKAvC5ax+y46iSfgP8Nv jOUQrYie7QPj/fbimSwLX4t1gmaDUf9OPUAIw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Fj9rnN35KfmPSE6TVpbjt263BVaqNACeKiF8SPgyCxDC2twurNVVkiVzOw17tAuLG/ h7gTCjxoohH/flxLcLx1g6Q5NmUGeDzO4ybPAhel0Bga7bAe0ybLC+Y8Olxx8r5dbkRh YVmvYAlLag1j5nDvnZJKQcL7Z17/z89lQ/p2k=
In-reply-to: <653283240911091053t7878496saa878571c6415853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240911090754j2d770bbcw64cc15a806618188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0911091040p4848592ch7a29543d06951e03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911091044m4e75983dr3077ca8b28652801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20911091046x588a5e44q17c2723f53a05ed8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911091053t7878496saa878571c6415853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/11/9 Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> proto-proto: Bring back Consultations, with Oracularities that go into
>>> effect when they become Pondered. Keep something analogous to our
>>
>> Proto: Oracularities take effect only with Bn Consent.
>
> Pondering was like Bn consent, except that if no one bothers to make a
> declaration of consistency it passes.

Yeah, I was going to suggest that we make it with Bn consent or simply
without objection, which is equivalent. It probably doesn't matter
whether we use the current dependent action system or a new
(in)consistency one.

-- 
Charles Walker
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Charles Walker
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread