Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160

0x44 on Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:06:09 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:05:57 +0000
In-reply-to: <347567.75819.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <347567.75819.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: RoundCube Webmail


On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:45:56 +0000 (GMT), M P Darke
<darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, I keep getting this wrong.
> 
> 2000 - Wooble is a CreTIN (Marr965) AI: 1 ordinary II: 0 (NOT ELIGIBLE)

Why do you think you're ineligible to vote for your own proposal?

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread