Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?

M P Darke on Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:24:18 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
From: M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1255105455; bh=jJ4RomklwFjvcPFePmoeZ2wAV1rL7uB11w3tzu3azHA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N6Uxm8/cLL68vJGeAB5tJM9K7/qXlleDz+gfACDts5QKAvg56NbivCeAlxIv5h1N19REPIZHB2KjMuyQUfj6X2kC/lWMJVnOYnrrEfLcrlnmNQ+JakPmCQmHh4K/O7d1QNAIKYZZx54pKLayKFQ3tmdSLVeQWpsanhTstqFvqWo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=w7Z+jXnQuQ249xUk+wTATHFpMJfrq7I2p0uwRKSpO/zSfrhR904zjj5RWJwVw7DAs0h6usFguPbSsSNzKRNsgGfSsQerXPLmZL6oG2ce6l6yy8FamDbVxuBwFS0oQaf0yIk3GJXf9CpPmwV+G83Vh6JhKdUoH5HKhgoMdVd2yd4=;
In-reply-to: <653283240910090922v3256e235kd3e74312bd82a135@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Wrong format, I believe. CFJs need to be "yes or no" questions, to my knowledge.

--- On Fri, 9/10/09, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 9 October, 2009, 5:22 PM

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wrong grounds: Just because yours was the only RP does not neccesarily mean it should automatically win. To that end:
> I submit a proposal:
> Append to the rule entitled "Emergencies" the text:
> "While B is in a state of emergency, unless there is more than one RP, the Emergency cannot end."

If this passes, it will have no effect due to insufficient AI.

CFJ: "What is AI?"
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] maybe we should retry the emergency?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread