C-walker on Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:32:51 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Paperweights


Tiger wrote:
> 2009/7/20 C-walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>      Any player CAN, with 3 the Consent of B (...)
> 3 the consent of B?

*shrug* It's what Rule 17 defines it as:

            3) With N the Consent of B, where N is an integer multiple
               of 0.1 with a minimum of 1.

>>      Ratification Without Objection CANNOT cause the repeal,
>>      amendment, enactment, or mutation of any Rule, rules to the
>>      contrary notwithstanding.
> And neither should any other kind of Ratification.

The idea is that the Consent based ways to ratify can be used to
ratify the ruleset from time-to-time without the need for a proposal.

-- 
C-walker
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss