Re: [s-d] [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 6 assigned to Judge Goethe

[Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamn<jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Right before the Agoran ruleset was adopted, a rule was created that
> alowed players to claim things that were not game objects (or however
> it was phrased). C-waker immediately went on to claim Barrack Obama
> and eir fellow player's brains, among other things. So it's
> essentially a question about whether gamestate carries over when it's
> no longer recognised by the rules.

Gratuitous arguments: under the old ruleset, anything in the game was
a game object.  Thus, if claims were in the game, they were game
objects and destroyed by the Refresh Proposal which explicitly
destroyed all game objects except for itself.  If they weren't game
objects, they weren't part of the gamestate so in the absence of rules
making them part of the gamestate in the new ruleset, they're not part
of the gamestate.

-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss