Jonatan Kilhamn on Tue, 12 May 2009 12:28:21 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity


2009/5/12 Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I deputise for the CotC to perform the following actions:
>> I rotate the bench, changing all sitting players to standing.
>
> Fails, the CotC CAN rotate the bench, but is never obligated to, so
> you can't deputise for em to do it.
>
> Still, your judge assignment is effective, just ILLEGAL. (I'd say an
> illegal action required to uphold someone's R101 right to resolve
> controversies is probably a trivial DISCHARGE, though.)
> --
Hmm. I read "SHALL NOT do so unless" as "SHALL do so if it's the only
way". But i guess "SHALL NOT unless "does not imply "SHALL if".

-- 
-Tiger
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss