0x44 on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:58:58 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inactivity...


I claim this answer to be inconsistent, obviously marr cares.

- 0x44

On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:49, Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:

I intend, without objection, to answer Consultation 237 NO.

C-walker


On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Marr965 wrote:

Does anyone on B actually care whether the Player known as Marr965
actually exists or not?

This is Consultation 237.  I assign it to Priest c-walker.

I become Inactive.

This is ineffective, but I'll avoid assigning you as a Priest until you
return to (unofficial) active status.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss