| Charles Walker on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:17:54 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] InterNomic |
I'm not sure whether he was joking or not; I'm just pointing out that it doesn't count as an objection until it is posted on the proper forum. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > I did notice, and if e was serious I hoped that e would either explain > why, or not notice it, or both.You mean e was joking? > > 2009/4/17 Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > He didn't. Note the mailing list. > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > > <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > >> 2009/4/15 Kenner Gordon <kennercat@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> > I object to Warrigal's judging. > >> > > >> Why would we want IN2 to be judged broken? > >> > -- > -Tiger > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- C-walker _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss